Search found 3 matches
- 19 Apr 2018 22:43
- Forum: User Help / Bug Reports
- Topic: FTPS implementation is not secure tight
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14756
Re: FTPS implementation is not secure tight
I always use the data channel protection "Private - P". Sample log: 20.04.2018 00:32:06.032 [FTPS Example] Starting to execute flow 'FTPS Example' with Context{global{global_tempoffset=10630479,global_mediaoffset=10627479},local{flow_name=FTPS Example,triggertime=1524177126023,trigger=Manual}} 20.04...
- 13 Apr 2018 15:31
- Forum: User Help / Bug Reports
- Topic: FTPS implementation is not secure tight
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14756
Re: FTPS implementation is not secure tight
With MiXplorer broadcast actions I don't have the direct ability to check within automagic if the file is successfully overwritten (without redownload and compare or reading the MiXplorer notification in a trigger).
- 11 Apr 2018 20:10
- Forum: User Help / Bug Reports
- Topic: FTPS implementation is not secure tight
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14756
FTPS implementation is not secure tight
FTPS actions require FTP server to have disabled following options: - Force PROT P to encrypt file transfers when using FTP over TLS - Require TLS session resumption on data connection when using PROT P These settings need to be enabled for file transfer to be secure. When these option on server are...